Monday, July 2, 2012

Biblical BluBlockers?

Biblical BluBlockers...A Misuse of Scripture?
Guest Sermon by Rev. Robert D. Shofner, Jr.
St. John's UCC- Boonville Indiana

            Not long ago, I was sitting in the waiting room of a clinic while Debbie was undergoing one of her annual Coumadin tests.  A trio of persons was sitting nearby, and they started talking about a new Bible study that one of them was attending.  The conversation went more or less like this.
            “Oh, I’m so excited!  Our teacher is leading us through a study on Revelations.”
            (I always cringe when I hear ‘Revelations’.  There’s no “s” in Revelation, people!)
            “Wow,” was one response.
            “Yes!  And we learned all about the meaning of the phrase, ‘the abomination that causes desolation.’  The study leader explained that the Lord had shown him what it meant.”  (Of course, it’s always much more interesting when God Himself weighs in on an interpretation!  So I perked up!)
            “He said, “I’ve discovered that it is helpful if you break words apart when you study Scripture.  If you break down ‘abomination,’ you get a-bom-in-nation.  This verse is a prediction that a number of nations would one day get the atomic bomb.  And it’s happening!”
            The listening couple nodded in agreement.  “Praise Jesus!  We’re in the last days!”
            I laughed so hard I almost fell out of my chair!  The fact that this story even happened makes me wonder if the Bible should come with a warning label on its cover: If you are already kind of nuts, this book will only make things worse
            On one hand, I’m glad the Scriptures are accessible to so many, yet on the other hand it bothers me that people treat it like a purely existential document which they feel free to interpret through their peculiar, and, frankly, uneducated view.
            I love the Bible.  It’s full of narrative history, genealogies, laws, poetry, proverbs, prophetic oracles, riddles, drama, biological sketches, parables, letters, sermons, and apocalypses.  It is a mystical book that fills the believing heart with life, wonder, grace, power and comfort.  All Christian believers treasure the Bible.  It has been the best-selling book in the world since printing began.  When Guttenberg invented the printing press, the first words he reproduced were the words of the Bible.
            But, giving people the impression that the Bible is easy to understand and easy to apply is really misleading.  That’s like saying marriage is easy.  Of course marriage can be wonderful, but it is not easy.  It’s not easy to keep your “I” on your spouse and off yourself.  It’s not easy for men to understand women (do I hear an ‘Amen’?) … or women to understand men (do I hear a ‘Right on, preacher!’?) 
            Nor is it easy to understand the Bible.  Truth be told, it’s often quite difficult.  Some texts seem impossible to figure out.  That’s why, throughout history, so many have used the Bible for their own, sometimes evil, purposes.
            Sacred scriptures, which have brought unspeakable comfort and blessing to countless millions, have also been used to bring pain, horror, and death to many.  The Bible has been used to validate the torture of so-called heretics, to justify slavery, to justify war, to oppress women, and to perpetuate other injustices.
            On a less disturbing, but equally ridiculous note, believers throughout history have used the Bible to “prove” specifically when Jesus would return.  (I guess He never got any of their memos.)
            How can this be?  How can there be such divergent conviction about the “truth”?
            Some would argue that the Bible doesn’t need interpretation; it just needs to be obeyed.  In some cases that’s true.  Paul commands, “Do everything without complaining or arguing”  (Philippians 2:14).  That doesn’t need interpretation; it just needs to be obeyed, plain and simple.
            But not all passages are that simple.  And if we are not careful, we can think our understanding of what we read is the meaning that the Holy Spirit intended.  But that is a huge presumption which ignores that our experience, the culture we live in, our prior understanding of words and ideas, and so on, always inject themselves into what we read.  We are just kidding ourselves if we think our biases cannot lead us astray and cause us to read unintended ideas into a text.
            Case in point:  Let’s say we grew up believing it is stupid (maybe even sinful) for people to get tattoos and have their bodies pierced.  Maybe we heard our mom and dad say it was wrong.  Or perhaps we believe that because, when we were growing up, tattoos and body piercings were only fashionable for mean-looking Harley riders and their biker mommas, and those on the low end of the socioeconomic scale.  Is that an unfair prejudice?  Sorry, but yeah.  But if that was our experience, it impacts how we think.
            Whatever the reason, inbred opinions cause us to read Bible texts with a predetermined selectivity.  We come across a verse such as, “Do not cut your bodies . . . or put tattoo marks on yourselves.  I am the Lord” (Leviticus 19:28).  Wow!  That just leaps off the page!  It’s like the voice of God – a spiritual epiphany.  No wonder tattoos and piercings bother me so much.  God feels the same way!  Never mind that in the previous verse men are told never to “cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard” (Leviticus 19:27).  We all ignore that verse.  But, logically, if we choose to harp on the command that forbids tattoos or piercings, reason demands that we should obey the hair rule.  That means churches should be full of men with mullets and scraggly beards!
            So, why aren’t Christians fair and reasonable when it comes to interpreting Bible texts like these?  Because something in each of us longs to emphasize the things that resonate with our own opinions and biases, while ignoring the ones that don’t.  However, it’s one thing to interpret Bible texts in a biased, squirrely way … it’s quite another to slap God’s endorsement on our interpretation.  But people do it every day.  It’s no wonder that what we do saddens Jesus’s heart … the same Jesus who said, “I give you a new command.  Love one another as I have loved you.”  And that is to be obeyed, not interpreted.   
Listen, it’s simple.   If we don’t like something, we just need to be honest about it.  Example.  I personally don’t like tattoos and piercings.  And when the boys were growing up, I told them tattoos and piercings were not allowed in my house.  I said, with a smile on my face, “It isn’t that God is against it.  In fact, God has tattoos.  He has us tattooed on His hand (Isaiah 49:16).  Apparently, He’s into tattoos.  It’s just that I am against it.  I don’t want you permanently altering your body until you are an adult and decide to do so.  I’m just weird.  Get used to it.”
            Hey … it’s okay for a parent to be uptight about some stuff.  We just can’t project our preferences on God and “swear . . . by heaven” (James 5:12) that God feels the same way.
            It’s not that we can’t have seemingly unreasonable opinions about things – we just need to own up to the reality that all of us have BluBlocker vision that affects how we see things.
            Remember them?  Back in the 1980s BluBlockers were all the rage … boasting of providing UV and blue-light protection for the eyes.  Since I have to wear glasses all the time, I couldn’t wear BluBlockers.  But the boys could, and did.
            One day we were heading out of town, and we stopped to fill up with gas and grab some treats for the road.  Debbie asked Michael to get some of her favorite gum … Wrigley’s in the blue pack.  He brought it back to the car and tossed it to his mom.  She looked at it, and asked, “Michael, how come you didn’t get me my regular kind?”
            “I did,” he answered.
            “No, you didn’t,” she said as she held up the pack for him to see.
            He looked at it, and said rather sarcastically, “Mom, the pack is blue.  That’s the kind you like!”
            She paused for a second and said, “Take off the BluBlockers, Michael.”
            He pulled off the glasses and instantly realized he had bought the green gum, thinking it was the blue.  Something in the BluBlockers made the green pack look blue.
            That’s what happens to us when our lives get colored by our experience.  We interpret our surroundings through that color.  That means what looks true sometimes isn’t, and what looks untrue is sometimes true.  Our ideas, presuppositions, and even prejudices color our reasoning and interpretive skills.  We don’t see clearly.
            People have been wearing BluBlockers all through history.  For example, in the premodern world a violent natural event like an earthquake or erupting volcano was thought of as some kind of vengeance from the gods.  Their Blublocker was that they believed gods did that sort of thing.  When there was a natural disaster, people assumed someone had killed a sacred animal or had committed some nasty crime that angered the gods and the cataclysmic event was retribution for that immoral act.
            In the modern world, we know that natural disasters brew because of a number of natural conditions.  This is our BluBlocker.  What premoderns saw as acts of the gods, moderns see as the logical results of nature’s adjustments.  No vengeance there.
            Different BluBlockers lead to different interpretations.
            Another example.  My mother-in-law believed there was no way the United States ever got those men on the moon – not really.  When asked about the live television broadcast that captured the event, she would say, “It was all Hollywood.  They staged the whole thing.  It was fake, and a lot of people made a lot of money from our tax dollars.”  Her BluBlocker conspiracy “glasses” made the whole thing look like a hoax. (On the other hand, she swore up and down that “X-Files” was actually true!)  
People who view the world as conspiratorial or interpret biblical prophecy by breaking words apart (especially since Scripture was originally written in Hebrew and Greek – not English) are wearing bad BluBlockers.  When we use faulty methods or tools to interpret something, the world ends up looking distorted and weird.
The BluBlockers we wear provide a framework for processing data, just like prescription eyeglasses from what we (who need them) see.  I remember getting my first pair of eyeglasses as a kid and being amazed at how it helped me see the world in a whole new way – clearly!  I had become used to the blur.
Sadly, there are many disorienting “prescription” BlueBlockers out there.  Instead of clearing things up, they actually distort and give us an inaccurate view of the world.  There is no place where this is truer than in the context of religion.  When it comes to what we believe about God (theology), how He wants us to live (doctrines), and what we can or cannot do (commandments and injunctions), Christians have so many different sets of glasses, we make Elton John’s eyewear collection seem paltry.
All kinds of things influence the way we see things: our experiences, our parents, the History Channel, an Oprah show we once saw, friends, the churches we’ve attended, our prejudices, expectations, hopes, failures, God, the devil, being an American – these all color the way we interpret our world and our faith.
The bottom line, when we want to avoid misusing and misinterpreting God’s Word, we first want to do an honest evaluation of how we look at the world, and what kind of BluBlockers we are wearing.
Next time we’ll look at some various examples of BluBlockers.  In the meantime, do your homework!

Let’s pray. 
Heavenly Father, we thank you for Your Word in all its variety, style, and truth.  Please accept our confession that we all wear BluBlockers that color our perception of our world and Your Word.  With our confession, open our eyes to clearly see.  Grant us honest and humble hearts that we may love one another as You have loved us.
And the people said, “Amen.”
                       

No comments: